| Author |
 Topic  |
|
GauravBhabu
Advanced Member
4288 Posts |
 Posted - 27 March 2003 : 22:25:15
|
quote:
Originally posted by Heynow777
The threat is Saddam supplying terrorists with WMD.
that is why they are not found in saddam's warehouses  |
 |
|
|
RichardKinser
Snitz Forums Admin
USA
16655 Posts |
Posted - 27 March 2003 : 22:28:27
|
| GauravBhabu, so can I hold you to the statement that there are no Weapons of Mass Destruction (Chemical Weapons/Biological Weapons/etc...) in Iraq? Is that what you are saying? |
|
|
|
seven
Senior Member
USA
1037 Posts |
Posted - 27 March 2003 : 22:31:34
|
We haven't even made it to Baghdad... and I hope they check the hospitals and schools too for WMD.
quote:
Originally posted by GauravBhabu
quote:
Originally posted by Heynow777
The threat is Saddam supplying terrorists with WMD.
that is why they are not found in saddam's warehouses
|
|
|
|
|
Heynow
Junior Member
374 Posts |
Posted - 27 March 2003 : 22:33:17
|
quote:
Originally posted by GauravBhabu
quote:
Originally posted by Heynow777
The threat is Saddam supplying terrorists with WMD.
that is why they are not found in saddam's warehouses
Iraq is a pretty big country, there war going on and we have yet to enter Baghdad. Unless the warehouse has a sign on the front..Chemicals Here
The war has just begun and the truth will come out.. |
Political Forums:::Stay n Chat
 |
|
|
|
GauravBhabu
Advanced Member
4288 Posts |
Posted - 27 March 2003 : 22:38:42
|
| And you are telling as if you found some terrorists with the weaopons which said manufactured and supplied by Saddam. |
|
|
|
GauravBhabu
Advanced Member
4288 Posts |
Posted - 27 March 2003 : 22:41:23
|
quote:
Originally posted by RichardKinser
GauravBhabu, so can I hold you to the statement that there are no Weapons of Mass Destruction (Chemical Weapons/Biological Weapons/etc...) in Iraq? Is that what you are saying?
You can believe as what you think is right, I will believe when some credible and solid evidence is provided by a credible source. |
Edited by - GauravBhabu on 27 March 2003 22:44:11 |
|
|
|
Heynow
Junior Member
374 Posts |
Posted - 27 March 2003 : 22:44:04
|
quote:
Originally posted by GauravBhabu
And you are telling as if you found some terrorists with the weaopons which said manufactured and supplied by Saddam.
If this is meant for me....I never claimed that. |
Political Forums:::Stay n Chat
|
|
|
|
GauravBhabu
Advanced Member
4288 Posts |
Posted - 27 March 2003 : 22:56:31
|
quote:
Originally posted by seahorse
quote:
Originally posted by reinsnitz
News Flash: 26 BILLION people did not protest the war today.
I think that would mean about 20 billion people were born yeasterday. 
Quiet a few records must have been set for possible entry in Guinness Book  |
|
|
|
RichardKinser
Snitz Forums Admin
USA
16655 Posts |
Posted - 27 March 2003 : 23:23:11
|
quote:
Originally posted by GauravBhabu
quote:
Originally posted by RichardKinser
GauravBhabu, so can I hold you to the statement that there are no Weapons of Mass Destruction (Chemical Weapons/Biological Weapons/etc...) in Iraq? Is that what you are saying?
You can believe as what you think is right, I will believe when some credible and solid evidence is provided by a credible source.
so is that a Yes or a No? |
|
|
|
seahorse
Senior Member
USA
1075 Posts |
Posted - 27 March 2003 : 23:52:30
|
quote:
quote:
Non-proliferation of WMD refers to all countries. Selective enforcement of non-proliferation against countries unfriendly to the US, makes the US appear hypocirtical and biased. The fact is that the US should be pursing the non-proliferation issue with Israel, Pakistan, India, Iran, and North Korea with equal determination. Most of these countries are lightyears head of Iraq in posessing WMD.
Light-years? How do you know? Look at Saddams record verses the other leaders.
Pakistan and India have already exploded nuclear weapons. Both were under US sactions until 9/11 when Bush lifted them in exchange for cooperation against Al Queda. Unlike Iraq which is trying to develop WMD, Pakistan and India already have them. The CIA estimates that North Korea probably already has one or two nuclear weapons.
While no formal announcement was ever made by the Israelis, most western military experts, including those from the US Military will acknowledge that Israel has nuclear weapons. UN Inspections of Iran's nuclear weapon efforts is on going.
The most recent UN inspections found no evidence that the Iraqi nuclear program had restarted. Biological and Checmical weapons were uncertain. |
Ken
===============
Worldwide Partner Group
Microsoft |
|
|
|
seahorse
Senior Member
USA
1075 Posts |
Posted - 28 March 2003 : 00:09:53
|
quote:
Originally posted by Heynow777
quote:
Originally posted by seahorse
Saddam Hussein understands far better than any other dictator, the power of the US Armed Forces. He understands how poorly his military performed in the first Gulf War. The idea that he would attack US interests in the region with WMD was highly unlikely. I will acknowledge that the Iraqi military did actively attempt to shoot down Coalition aircraft patroling the Iraqi no-fly zones. Of course, now that we've invaded, I would judge the likelihood of the Iraqis using WMD as quite high, possibly even certain.
The threat is Saddam supplying terrorists with WMD.
[quote]
Pakistan, which has supported the Taliban in the past, has an active nuclear weapons program. As I mentioned earlier, Pakistani nuclear scientists have met with Bin Laden. If preventing terrorists from acquiring WMD is the stated goal, far greater attention should be placed on other countries.
I think it is extremely unlikely that Saddam would give terrorists access to WMD. Bush was more than willing to invade with Iraq just to get better UN inspections of Iraq. Do you think that Saddam, who is already well aware that Bush is looking for any excuse to put a bullet in his head cruise missile through his Presidential Palace window, would be stupid enough to give terrorists access to WMD?
So there are Al Queda terrorists in Iraq. There are Al Queda terrorists in Pakistan too. That doesn't mean that the Pakistanis are giving WMD to terrorists.
|
Ken
===============
Worldwide Partner Group
Microsoft |
Edited by - seahorse on 28 March 2003 02:06:09 |
|
|
|
bjlt
Senior Member
1144 Posts |
Posted - 28 March 2003 : 01:27:08
|
quote:
Originally posted by seahorse
So there are Al Queda terrorists in Iraq. There are Al Queda terrorists in Pakistan too. That doesn't mean that the Pakistanis are giving WMD to terrorists.
And there are Al Queda terrorists in the US, and I don't know if it means that the Americans are giving WMD to terrorists.
What if an American, not one in close relationship or a member of the terrorists groups on the list, but just an ordinary American, does such a teroorist activity? Isn't it possible? If thathappens, I wonder what the US government would do, esp if he gets the WMD from somewhere in the US. |
|
|
|
Nathan
Help Moderator
USA
7664 Posts |
Posted - 28 March 2003 : 01:29:46
|
Ummm . . . . How about the Oaklahoma City bombing.
Was that not just an ""ordinary American"" doing such a terrorist act? |
 Nathan Bales
CoreBoard | Active Users Download |
Edited by - Nathan on 28 March 2003 01:42:41 |
|
|
|
bjlt
Senior Member
1144 Posts |
Posted - 28 March 2003 : 03:01:29
|
Is it possible that someday there are not enough resources, e.g. oil, on the earth to support the cosume of all people?
I wonder what the US will do then. I noticed that the US is the nation that does not want to control the output of CO2, and there are people saying that it's a nation do not want to sacrifice its current interests for that of its offsprings, and the theory of culture conflicts are actually preparing for the fight to control the limited resources.
if it's possible, since the richest people consume more and not want to sacrifice, also the tech is so advanced that many things do not need to be done by poor labors now, their conclusion is some richest people may consider genocidal.
mmnnn...... I have no idea on this myself. |
|
|
|
Nathan
Help Moderator
USA
7664 Posts |
Posted - 28 March 2003 : 03:41:16
|
Don't dump Bush's failure to sign the Kyoto accords on the american people. Many of us agree with the concept and even think it should go FURTHER.
Personally I think that Americans will eventually overcome their consumeristic falts through technology. Unfortuanly in order to get to that point we have to pass though a 'dark age' of polution and resource overuse.
Hopefully if gas prices rise, alternatives will be saught pushing technology further. And hopefully to a cleaner renuable future. |
Nathan Bales
CoreBoard | Active Users Download |
Edited by - Nathan on 28 March 2003 03:42:19 |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Topic Locked
