| Author |
 Topic  |
|
HuwR
Forum Admin
United Kingdom
20584 Posts |
 Posted - 08 August 2002 : 09:30:23
|
since one is a full post page and the other is a quick post form why should they be consistant 
if you don't include your signature, it will post QUICKER |
 |
|
|
wii
Free ASP Hosts Moderator
Denmark
2632 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 09:32:30
|
Well, even though we don´t agree, it´s really not that important - easy to change, as I said.
 |
|
|
|
snaayk
Senior Member
USA
1061 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 09:40:14
|
Quick Reply Rules!
Just had to say it!
That space to the left is interesting....i can widen the textarea, make a mode to use it, add MOTD, a warning, a picture of myself...I like that one most..
Next MOD: Picture of snaayk on quickreply.
 |
|
|
|
Aaron S.
Average Member
USA
985 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 09:53:35
|
Why does the Reply on post.asp have a screensize option but the quick reply doesn't.
By that I don't mean that quick reply should have it... but what is the point of it being on post.asp? Why not just have it be as long as the table below it (that shows the current posts) - this is how quick reply is done?
--Aaron
DOWNLOAD GREAT NEW MODS HERE |
|
|
|
HuwR
Forum Admin
United Kingdom
20584 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 10:25:30
|
| the QUICK reply is so you can just post a quick reply, whereas POST.ASP allows you to do formatting add smilies, and change the width of the post window sa that you can see what you are posting without wrapping etc, we could just give you a single line edit box,and save all the stupid discussion. |
|
|
|
HuwR
Forum Admin
United Kingdom
20584 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 10:27:05
|
| there ya go, now you only have one posting place, so no confusion now |
|
|
|
RichardKinser
Snitz Forums Admin
USA
16655 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 10:27:58
|
Exactly what Huw said... The Quick Reply is not a feature laden post box, if you need all the extra stuff on the post page, then use that instead.
during testing I did try using style="width:100%;" but it didn't work on every browser I tried it on. |
|
|
|
Gremlin
General Help Moderator
New Zealand
7528 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 10:28:07
|
Meanie
www.daoc-halo.com |
|
|
|
Aaron S.
Average Member
USA
985 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 10:29:18
|
I have no problems at all with the quick reply.
I was just wondering why screensize is needed... every other table is relative except for that one.
--Aaron
DOWNLOAD GREAT NEW MODS HERE |
|
|
|
HuwR
Forum Admin
United Kingdom
20584 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 10:38:11
|
| none of the textareas have a relative size |
|
|
|
Aaron S.
Average Member
USA
985 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 10:43:28
|
quote:
Originally posted by HuwR
none of the textareas have a relative size
Ah, you are right.
--Aaron
DOWNLOAD GREAT NEW MODS HERE |
|
|
|
Azaniah
Senior Member
United Kingdom
1004 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 10:44:18
|
Don't take quick reply away 
-------
Eagles fly!, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines. |
|
|
|
@tomic
Senior Member
USA
1790 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 11:37:49
|
I hate to say it, but the Quick Reply will be one of the first things I remove. Don't ask me why but I just don't like it.
@tomic
http://www.skepticfriends.org |
|
|
|
Azaniah
Senior Member
United Kingdom
1004 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 11:42:34
|
Really?
I think it's really useful - for a start you can naturally see the previous post / reply - as the size of the reply textarea is that much smaller.
Generally I think it's all round a good idea.
-------
Eagles fly!, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines. |
|
|
|
Davio
Development Team Member
Jamaica
12217 Posts |
Posted - 08 August 2002 : 11:50:18
|
Now look what you guys made Huwr do. You made him turn off the quick reply before I could even get to enjoy it. 
«-----------------------------------»
Join the Snitz Forums WebRing ! |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Topic Locked
