Snitz Forums 2000
Snitz Forums 2000
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Snitz Forums 2000 DEV-Group
 DEV Discussions (General)
 Why?
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 3

Gremlin
General Help Moderator

New Zealand
7528 Posts

Posted - 04 July 2002 :  18:40:00  Show Profile  Visit Gremlin's Homepage
Archives a great feature IMO, enables you to wipe a forum clean yet retain all the old posts still.

I search the archives here always if I'm looking for something. thing is people like myself who probably read 90% or more of the posts made here can remember seeing 'something' about a paricular issue or problem so go straight to the search screen. New people coming along to the forum generally just think they're the first person to hit such a problem and post without searching at all.

www.daoc-halo.com
Go to Top of Page

Gremlin
General Help Moderator

New Zealand
7528 Posts

Posted - 04 July 2002 :  22:11:32  Show Profile  Visit Gremlin's Homepage
quote:
Why do we bog down our server and hinder its performance by keeping 100's of thousands of posts in an archive when nobody bothers to use it.


Actually how does it hinder performance if its not used ? thats almost an oxymoron ;) ... Apart from using some space I can't really think of performance issues with it. Theres one issue on default.asp where every category it goes out to see if theres any archive posts on it so it can display the icon which can be cleaned up and turned into a single call, but what else am I missing here ? Call me thick if ya want I just dont get it :)



www.daoc-halo.com
Go to Top of Page

redbrad0
Advanced Member

USA
3725 Posts

Posted - 05 July 2002 :  00:49:52  Show Profile  Visit redbrad0's Homepage  Send redbrad0 an AOL message
well i search the archies once in awhile. the only thing i hate is i do a search, and i dont get what im looking for, then i have to do another search to just search the archive forums. if there was a way to search both of them at the same time i think it would be much more useful.

Brad
Web Hosting with SQL Server @ $24.95 per month
Go to Top of Page

snaayk
Senior Member

USA
1061 Posts

Posted - 05 July 2002 :  01:34:32  Show Profile  Visit snaayk's Homepage  Send snaayk an AOL message  Send snaayk an ICQ Message  Send snaayk a Yahoo! Message
I'm with Gremlin, most of the time I search the Archives it's because I KNOW that I saw something come up. Or a bookmark I made is no longer valid I go to the archive section to look it up.

Perhaps a solution is to only archive certain forums. And delete the rest. This would delete a lot of unused space. I suppose this especially important if your getting to your host's SQL server limit and you don't want to buy more space !See ya' old posts!

Go to Top of Page

Doug G
Support Moderator

USA
6493 Posts

Posted - 05 July 2002 :  03:38:13  Show Profile
If you're considering deleting archived posts would you please zip up a backup and send it to me first?

I don't search them often but occasionally, and the posts there are a great resource I'd hate to lose.


======
Doug G
======
Go to Top of Page

HuwR
Forum Admin

United Kingdom
20595 Posts

Posted - 05 July 2002 :  07:11:25  Show Profile  Visit HuwR's Homepage
quote:

Actually how does it hinder performance if its not used ? thats almost an oxymoron



Simply because of the space it takes, don't forget a SQL db still exists in a physical location, so the data has to be fetched in the same way a file is fetched, admittedly SQL is more efficient at doing this, but data is still spread around the 250Mb data file, so th large your db the more work it has to do,

I didn't say I was considerring deleting them, just trying to find out what peoples views on them are, since less than 1/2% of the 5000 daily visitors use the search page, admittedly it's better to have them archived than still in the main tables, but they account for a very large percentage of the total db size

Go to Top of Page

Roland
Advanced Member

Netherlands
9335 Posts

Posted - 05 July 2002 :  08:44:31  Show Profile
quote:

I added a link to it next to the other Search Link.



Thanks. I'll give it a try later

Roland

http://www.frutzle.com

Snitz Exchange | Do's and Dont's
Go to Top of Page

Gremlin
General Help Moderator

New Zealand
7528 Posts

Posted - 05 July 2002 :  09:55:17  Show Profile  Visit Gremlin's Homepage
quote:
but data is still spread around the 250Mb data file, so th large your db the more work it has to do,


Sort of, Indexes take the brunt of the workload and if youve got a good maintenance plan setup and are defragmenting indexes etc really your database could be 5 times as large and the performance difference would still be marginal. I dont think theres any indexes on the archive data by default though I guess you've already added some in there if not anyway :)

www.daoc-halo.com

Edited by - Gremlin on 05 July 2002 09:56:21
Go to Top of Page

HuwR
Forum Admin

United Kingdom
20595 Posts

Posted - 05 July 2002 :  10:19:42  Show Profile  Visit HuwR's Homepage
quote:

quote:
but data is still spread around the 250Mb data file, so th large your db the more work it has to do,


Sort of, Indexes take the brunt of the workload and if youve got a good maintenance plan setup and are defragmenting indexes etc really your database could be 5 times as large and the performance difference would still be marginal. I dont think theres any indexes on the archive data by default though I guess you've already added some in there if not anyway :)

www.daoc-halo.com

Edited by - Gremlin on 05 July 2002 09:56:21



I am not specifically talking of indexes/db performance, but rather the underlying architecture, which does make a vast difference as the databases get larger, which is why high powered SQL servers have dtabases mapped across several different physical drives, and I don't mean raid or striping, because of the performance gains from splitting your db this way, this is even more noticeable if your db is not a fixed size, but set to grow as your data expands, much the same as your windows paging file does.

A db index is just a map, just because they are kept clean and up to date, doesn't prevent the data being spread all over the place, just that the index knows where to find it.

Go to Top of Page

bjlt
Senior Member

1144 Posts

Posted - 05 July 2002 :  12:32:39  Show Profile
I think a feature of selected or featured posts would be useful. adm/mod can mark a topic as featured and they'll be archived in a featured topics table.

or there're better ways of doing similar things. just an idea.

Go to Top of Page

VodkaFish
Average Member

USA
654 Posts

Posted - 05 July 2002 :  12:37:25  Show Profile  Send VodkaFish an AOL message  Send VodkaFish an ICQ Message  Send VodkaFish a Yahoo! Message
Just to chime in, I use the archive if possible. Before I ask questions, I always search, and then archive search, then post. As someone else already pointed out, sometimes it's hard to hit the right keywords, but that's true with any search feature. Even though it may slow down things a tad, those .5% of questions that get answered may be worth it time-wise. On one of my forums, the archive feature is great. I'd like a way to reference the posts, but need them all closed and moved as my forums are seasonal. It's very efficient. I'm sure that's specific to each forum, but I don't mind the bulk.

v ø d k â f ï § h
Go to Top of Page

Gremlin
General Help Moderator

New Zealand
7528 Posts

Posted - 07 July 2002 :  00:37:31  Show Profile  Visit Gremlin's Homepage
Yes putting DB filegroups on separate disks can help though I'd normally not bother with a DB so small as a couple of hundred meg.

Moving the archives into a separate table may be a better solution for this forum.

www.daoc-halo.com
Go to Top of Page

HuwR
Forum Admin

United Kingdom
20595 Posts

Posted - 07 July 2002 :  10:56:50  Show Profile  Visit HuwR's Homepage
quote:

Yes putting DB filegroups on separate disks can help though I'd normally not bother with a DB so small as a couple of hundred meg.
[quote]
Well you should try it, unless you only have one db, then it won't help, but merely putting the two db's on seperate drives makes quite a big difference, regardless of their size

[quote]
Moving the archives into a separate table may be a better solution for this forum.



They already are, and like I said, I am talking about sytem architectur not database table design.

Go to Top of Page

Gremlin
General Help Moderator

New Zealand
7528 Posts

Posted - 07 July 2002 :  19:58:57  Show Profile  Visit Gremlin's Homepage
quote:
Moving the archives into a separate table may be a better solution for this forum.

Table should read Database.

www.daoc-halo.com
Go to Top of Page

HuwR
Forum Admin

United Kingdom
20595 Posts

Posted - 07 July 2002 :  22:40:39  Show Profile  Visit HuwR's Homepage
quote:

Table should read Database.

www.daoc-halo.com


Yes, something I am thinking about.

Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Snitz Forums 2000 © 2000-2021 Snitz™ Communications Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.88 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07