Snitz Forums 2000
Snitz Forums 2000
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Snitz Forums 2000 MOD-Group
 MOD Add-On Forum (W/O Code)
 antispam Captcha mod
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

HuwR
Forum Admin

United Kingdom
20593 Posts

Posted - 24 February 2009 :  11:14:32  Show Profile  Visit HuwR's Homepage  Reply with Quote
You are going to be pretty surprised to find out that your 1% is actually a lot higher

Today, 20% of state-of-the-art Captchas are not solved correctly on the first try (and often, there’s no second try). At the same time, bots have evolved to the point that commercially available software can successfully defeat the most difficult Captcha 10-20% of the time.


Beyond the obvious security failures, Captcha has other problems. Visually impaired users find it impossible to use, running afoul of the Disabilities Act (which guarantees equal access to all people, no matter their disabilities). Audio versions of Captcha have emerged for the visually-impaired, but not all sites use the available audio version and problems remain among other segments of the disabled computer-using market. User dissatisfaction is high with Captcha as well and Captcha complaints abound on the web. The most vocal complaints come from users of time-sensitive websites, such as a ticket venders for sporting events or concerts. The time it takes a user to solve the puzzle can mean they lose out on successfully buying a ticket.
Captcha isn’t only annoying to users, it’s wasteful. Placing barrier to interaction is costing the economy a lot of money, since by its very nature it slows down transactions. A human operator must take the time to solve the puzzle and enter the solution. 15-20 seconds of each user’s time may not sound like a lot, but it quickly adds up. One of the creators of Captcha (a professor at Carnegie Mellon University) estimated recently to Time magazine that 200 million Captchas are solved daily. Even at only 15 seconds each, that is over 800,000 user-hours consumed each and every day solving Captchas<
Go to Top of Page

Shaggy
Support Moderator

Ireland
6780 Posts

Posted - 24 February 2009 :  11:16:23  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by bobby131313
Sure, less than 1% maybe.
It's actually more like 10%, possibly more.

<

Search is your friend
“I was having a mildly paranoid day, mostly due to the
fact that the mad priest lady from over the river had
taken to nailing weasels to my front door again.”
Go to Top of Page

bobby131313
Senior Member

USA
1163 Posts

Posted - 24 February 2009 :  11:31:22  Show Profile  Visit bobby131313's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I still fail to see the point. Since 10% may not be able to do it, block them all instead?<

Switch the order of your title tags
Go to Top of Page

Podge
Support Moderator

Ireland
3776 Posts

Posted - 24 February 2009 :  11:46:38  Show Profile  Send Podge an ICQ Message  Send Podge a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
HuwR's point was that if 1 person cannot solve a CAPTCHA you shouldn't be using it.<

Podge.

The Hunger Site - Click to donate free food | My Blog | Snitz 3.4.05 AutoInstall (Beta!)

My Mods: CAPTCHA Mod | GateKeeper Mod
Tutorial: Enable subscriptions on your board

Warning: The post above or below may contain nuts.
Go to Top of Page

bobby131313
Senior Member

USA
1163 Posts

Posted - 24 February 2009 :  11:53:07  Show Profile  Visit bobby131313's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Maybe I'm just dense.

So I'm getting DOS attacks on my search page...

1. I can disable the search page to all non-members.

2. I can add some type of human verification which only 10% of the entire group I've blocked above may not be able to negotiate.

Which do I pick?<

Switch the order of your title tags
Go to Top of Page

SiSL
Average Member

Turkey
671 Posts

Posted - 24 February 2009 :  13:11:28  Show Profile  Visit SiSL's Homepage  Reply with Quote
While Gatekeeper could be best effective, I don't think it is any less annoying or user-friendly at all. People should not be doing maths and brain exercises just to post something... While we can be all of combating spam, annoyed users either by Gatekeeper method is far worse than annoyed admins.

So I'm in favor of Captcha if a spam protection is a must than Gatekeeper. I find Gatekeeper annoying so are my users of every "capactiy" from low to high IQ to understand what they are looking or why questions asked.

As for visually impaired, there are very good public spam solutions with listening solutions.<

CHIP Online Forum

My Mods
Select All Code | Fix a vulnerability for your private messages | Avatar Categories W/ Avatar Gallery Mod | Complaint Manager
Admin Level Revisited | Merge Forums | No More Nested Quotes Mod

Edited by - SiSL on 24 February 2009 13:16:16
Go to Top of Page

SiSL
Average Member

Turkey
671 Posts

Posted - 24 February 2009 :  13:18:41  Show Profile  Visit SiSL's Homepage  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by bobby131313

Maybe I'm just dense.

So I'm getting DOS attacks on my search page...

1. I can disable the search page to all non-members.

2. I can add some type of human verification which only 10% of the entire group I've blocked above may not be able to negotiate.

Which do I pick?



3. Or you can do a session check and not let non-cookie clients.

4. With above solution, you can also limit time-intervals of next search.<

CHIP Online Forum

My Mods
Select All Code | Fix a vulnerability for your private messages | Avatar Categories W/ Avatar Gallery Mod | Complaint Manager
Admin Level Revisited | Merge Forums | No More Nested Quotes Mod
Go to Top of Page

bobby131313
Senior Member

USA
1163 Posts

Posted - 24 February 2009 :  13:26:44  Show Profile  Visit bobby131313's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I'll buy that.<

Switch the order of your title tags
Go to Top of Page

HuwR
Forum Admin

United Kingdom
20593 Posts

Posted - 24 February 2009 :  14:16:59  Show Profile  Visit HuwR's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I would implement a counter and limit the number of searches in a certain period of time, that will prevent DOS attacks, if they go over your limit redirect them to google <
Go to Top of Page

Podge
Support Moderator

Ireland
3776 Posts

Posted - 24 February 2009 :  18:58:25  Show Profile  Send Podge an ICQ Message  Send Podge a Yahoo! Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
I don't think it is any less annoying or user-friendly at all. People should not be doing maths and brain exercises just to post something... While we can be all of combating spam, annoyed users either by Gatekeeper method is far worse than annoyed admins.
It all depends on the question you pick. It can be anything simple as long as its unique e.g.

Type the word Hello in this box -> Hello
What colour in an Orange? Orange
How do you spell dog? Dog
What is 2 + 2 ? 4

phoenixtaz13, you should include search.asp in your robots.txt

User-agent: *
Disallow: search.asp
Disallow: register.asp
Disallow: members.asp
Disallow: search.asp
Disallow: active.asp
Disallow: pop_profile.asp
Disallow: login.asp
Disallow: post_info.asp
Disallow: pop_profile.asp
Disallow: pop_mail.asp


And there's no reason to believe its a DOS attack. It could be a legit web crawler. Did you get the i.p. address from active_users.asp?<

Podge.

The Hunger Site - Click to donate free food | My Blog | Snitz 3.4.05 AutoInstall (Beta!)

My Mods: CAPTCHA Mod | GateKeeper Mod
Tutorial: Enable subscriptions on your board

Warning: The post above or below may contain nuts.
Go to Top of Page

phoenixtaz13
Junior Member

129 Posts

Posted - 26 February 2009 :  08:43:36  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
podge,

i'll apply the robot.txt... its a google bot... yup, got the ip, forgot where i wrote it...

many, many thanks....
<
Go to Top of Page

Shaggy
Support Moderator

Ireland
6780 Posts

Posted - 26 February 2009 :  09:09:45  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Um ... didn't you add a robots.txt file already?

<

Search is your friend
“I was having a mildly paranoid day, mostly due to the
fact that the mad priest lady from over the river had
taken to nailing weasels to my front door again.”
Go to Top of Page

phoenixtaz13
Junior Member

129 Posts

Posted - 26 February 2009 :  10:28:52  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
what i meant was, the time i experienced the bot/crawler, i havent installed the robot.txt...

thanks... :)

<
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Snitz Forums 2000 © 2000-2021 Snitz™ Communications Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.16 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07