| Author |
 Topic  |
|
MarkJH
Senior Member
United Kingdom
1722 Posts |
 Posted - 17 January 2007 : 16:48:27
|
Nope, I did it the correct way around. Copied the URL of the topic I wanted to move into the sticky topic then merged them via the sticky.
Okay, just did some investigation.
This only happens when you merge a topic into another topic when the topic you are merging is older than the topic you are merging it into... if that makes sense.  < |
Bandlink.net - http://www.bandlink.net/
Bandlink Music Forums - http://www.bandlink.net/forum/ |
 |
|
|
Davio
Development Team Member
Jamaica
12217 Posts |
Posted - 17 January 2007 : 17:25:23
|
lol No that did not make sense at all. lol
Ok so you have the sticky topic open, clicked the merge icon and entered the url of the non-sticky topic, and clicked merge, correct?
And which topic was older (not the last post date. the date of the topic.)? The sticky topic or the non-sticky topic?< |
Support Snitz Forums
|
Edited by - Davio on 17 January 2007 17:26:12 |
|
|
|
Davio
Development Team Member
Jamaica
12217 Posts |
Posted - 17 January 2007 : 17:29:53
|
Ok I see. Because the non-sticky topic is older, then it will because the first post in the thread, meaning the sticky topic will be merged with the non-sticky topic.
Alrighty, will see what I can do.< |
Support Snitz Forums
|
|
|
|
AnonJr
Moderator
United States
5768 Posts |
Posted - 17 January 2007 : 17:32:09
|
Glad you understood...  < |
|
|
|
MarkJH
Senior Member
United Kingdom
1722 Posts |
|
|
Davio
Development Team Member
Jamaica
12217 Posts |
Posted - 17 January 2007 : 18:13:55
|
quote:
Originally posted by AnonJr
Glad you understood...
LoL! You should try writing this mod. That's all I kept singing in my head. I'm telling you, I wanted to sit in a nice white room wrapped in those white suit they put those crazy people in. Would have been relaxing for me.  < |
Support Snitz Forums
|
|
|
|
AnonJr
Moderator
United States
5768 Posts |
Posted - 18 January 2007 : 08:31:27
|
I work at a hospital... I think something can be arranged. But not until this MOD is finished....  < |
|
|
|
MarkJH
Senior Member
United Kingdom
1722 Posts |
|
|
AnonJr
Moderator
United States
5768 Posts |
Posted - 24 January 2007 : 22:11:52
|
| He's probably "wrapped up" by now... < |
|
|
|
HuwR
Forum Admin
United Kingdom
20584 Posts |
Posted - 25 January 2007 : 05:32:37
|
| I was actually thinking of maybe implementing this for the .net version, but to be honest I can't fathom out why you would actually want or need to do this, so if someone could maybe enlighten me as to the thinking behind merging topics I would be most grateful< |
|
|
|
ruirib
Snitz Forums Admin
Portugal
26364 Posts |
Posted - 25 January 2007 : 05:44:47
|
Well I guess this is just meant to organize a board, joining multiple threads on the same issue. Quite often people post in more than a thread about the same issue, so such a tool can reduce the number of threads on similar issues.
This has been the foremost reason for people requiring such a mod.< |
Snitz 3.4 Readme | Like the support? Support Snitz too |
|
|
|
HuwR
Forum Admin
United Kingdom
20584 Posts |
Posted - 25 January 2007 : 06:07:57
|
| ok, I see that, but my understanding of how it works, would indicate that all the replies in such a merge would get jumbled up together as it is still order by reply date, so replies would appear completely out of context, or am I missing something ?< |
|
|
|
ruirib
Snitz Forums Admin
Portugal
26364 Posts |
Posted - 25 January 2007 : 06:19:52
|
| Well I guess the hope is that if the subject is the same, replies will be clear enough. Of course, using this one with the split topic mod can allow you all the flexibility you need to manage any situation.< |
Snitz 3.4 Readme | Like the support? Support Snitz too |
|
|
|
HuwR
Forum Admin
United Kingdom
20584 Posts |
Posted - 25 January 2007 : 07:11:36
|
| Ok, I just thought that maybe I had missed something and had got the wrong end of the stick so to speak. anyway, enough digressing, will leave the topic for it's intended purpose < |
|
|
|
AnonJr
Moderator
United States
5768 Posts |
Posted - 25 January 2007 : 08:52:52
|
quote:
Originally posted by HuwR
ok, I see that, but my understanding of how it works, would indicate that all the replies in such a merge would get jumbled up together as it is still order by reply date, so replies would appear completely out of context, or am I missing something ?
You mean thread conversations never get jumbled up naturally? < |
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Merge Topic Mod BETA 2
