Author |
Topic |
alex042
Average Member
USA
631 Posts |
Posted - 07 September 2002 : 16:28:19
|
This is an update of HuwR, Fido, and AZNKnight's Statistics Add-On.
Screenshots
Features:
- Forum & Member Statistics including top topics, posters, members, topics, and posts per month and day.
Version History: v1.1.0 09/07/02 v1.1.1 09/11/02 - Bug Fixes: Recordset closes v1.1.1 09/19/02 - *Available to previous MOD author*
|
Edited by - alex042 on 19 September 2002 18:19:57 |
|
ajhvdb
Junior Member
Netherlands
392 Posts |
Posted - 07 September 2002 : 19:06:54
|
I'm sorry but same question here. Thanks |
Edited by - ajhvdb on 11 September 2002 19:58:04 |
|
|
crash
Advanced Member
Netherlands
2064 Posts |
Posted - 07 September 2002 : 19:51:22
|
what do you mean I'm sorry but same question here.? alex042 posted a link to the download above! |
cHosting.nl |
|
|
ssnapier
Junior Member
USA
126 Posts |
Posted - 08 September 2002 : 02:20:04
|
look at his sig....
|
If freedom were shareware, soldiers are the ones who pay for it. |
|
|
Immanuel
New Member
64 Posts |
Posted - 08 September 2002 : 08:56:05
|
It means, that he/she asked for info on the MOD - the same way as in another thread with a MOD with no explanation.
Immanuel |
|
|
TMA
Starting Member
USA
17 Posts |
Posted - 11 September 2002 : 22:35:17
|
Works great!!! I couldn't figure out where to add the link within the reqular forum stats, so I created it in the word "Statistics" on default.asp |
Warped? |
|
|
HarshReality
Junior Member
USA
128 Posts |
Posted - 16 September 2002 : 19:00:06
|
I was under the impression we were making 3.4 addons response.write to mathch the other forum code.... |
Anti Social Personality |
|
|
dayve
Forum Moderator
USA
5820 Posts |
Posted - 16 September 2002 : 20:07:54
|
quote: Originally posted by HarshReality
I was under the impression we were making 3.4 addons response.write to mathch the other forum code....
although it would be nice, it is not mandatory. in fact when I release the upload avatar mod for 3.4 here shortly it will not use a whole bunch of response.writes ... well it may, depending on how lazy I feel at the time
|
|
|
|
alex042
Average Member
USA
631 Posts |
Posted - 16 September 2002 : 22:29:06
|
quote: I was under the impression we were making 3.4 addons response.write to mathch the other forum code....
All response.write conversion isn't necessary for a MOD to work with v3.4. Since I wasn't the orignal author of this MOD, I've left most of the code in tact as it was in the previous version, just made a few minor changes to get it to work with v3.4. I figured this would buy the orignal authors some time to develop it how they wanted while people had something that works.
Btw, I'm not a big fan of all response.write anyway so, IPGate, the one MOD I did write may not end up being all response.writes.
|
Edited by - alex042 on 16 September 2002 22:35:19 |
|
|
P6A
Starting Member
Germany
7 Posts |
|
dayve
Forum Moderator
USA
5820 Posts |
Posted - 18 September 2002 : 20:25:52
|
just remembered, this code needs some reviewing because it will show topic titles in private forums! although a non member can not get into the topic, sometimes the topic title is enough to stir some controversy. |
|
|
|
alex042
Average Member
USA
631 Posts |
Posted - 18 September 2002 : 21:31:59
|
quote: just remembered, this code needs some reviewing because it will show topic titles in private forums!
Seems like I do remember spotting this when I was upgrading the code, but I didn't want to modify the actual functionality of the features and didn't figure it would be too big of an issue if the stats were only available to moderators and admins. This shouldn't be too difficult to implement a fix to block out private forums from showing up on the list and/or doing a security check.
|
Edited by - alex042 on 18 September 2002 21:32:52 |
|
|
dayve
Forum Moderator
USA
5820 Posts |
Posted - 18 September 2002 : 23:39:38
|
I believe that if information is place in private areas, then all aspects of it should remain private, including the subjects. there was a huge issue on an forum where a private and hidden discussion about the banishment of a member was discussed. the title was something like
"Consideration for banishment of jake"
well jake found out and decided that since he was being considered for banishment he would raise hell during his final days and sure enough it stirred up quite a controversy.
anyway, I think I will edit the code which should be fairly simple to do to omit private items to those not having access to begin with. |
|
|
|
ROB
Junior Member
USA
347 Posts |
|
alex042
Average Member
USA
631 Posts |
Posted - 03 October 2002 : 09:09:51
|
quote: Where did the download link go? If it was in alex042's signature, it's gone now.
I've removed the link per my post here.
|
|
|
ROB
Junior Member
USA
347 Posts |
Posted - 03 October 2002 : 11:58:21
|
Who then, if anyone, is updating this MOD? Alan (Aznknight) has moved on to .NET these days, so I doubt he'll be interested. Has one of the other original authors picked this up?
I appreciate the way you're handling MOD updates, but would it be possible for you to email me what you've got... on an "unofficial" basis? |
Jeff (ROB) Hester BigBlueNetwork | BigBlueBall | Christian Church Today |
|
|
Topic |
|