Snitz Forums 2000
Snitz Forums 2000
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Help Groups for Snitz Forums 2000 Users
 Help: General / Classic ASP versions(v3.4.XX)
 Forum Directory Security
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

loftwork
Starting Member

10 Posts

Posted - 13 November 2008 :  09:35:33  Show Profile
Hi,

I get spurious registrations. Using the gatekeeper mod w. update for 3.4.06 makes no difference and the bogus registrations do not pile up waiting for activation so I assume it's a direct manipulation of the mdb file? They don't seem to post or hack.

The forum code is all in an accessible directory under the website root (http://www.raes-hfg.com/forum/). I remember seeing a note about encrypting the forum directory but can't find it anywhere. Is that possible?

When several dozen of these members accumulate is there any reason why they should not be removed from the mdb file members list just by deleting the lines with MSAccess (since there isn't a bulk delete in Snitz)?

Thanks very much for any enlightenment!
<

AnonJr
Moderator

United States
5768 Posts

Posted - 13 November 2008 :  10:04:59  Show Profile  Visit AnonJr's Homepage
First, have you checked to make sure that the Gatekeeper MOD is really working and has good questions? If its not working right or you're using the same questions as a million other sites than it won't help much.

Also, how do you know they are "spurious registrations"? (not being sarcastic, but some people don't like to fill in personal information, etc.)

There are a few other spam fighting tips mentioned here: http://forum.snitz.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=65057 (stickied at the top of this forum for your convenience )

I'd also run through the Bug Reports and Security updates and see if you're missing any patches, etc. Then I'd go through and see if all the Admin settings are as they should be. If they aren't, check your Admin list to see if anyone is there that shouldn't be. If you find someone, demote them and lock the account.

That's enough to start with. If you're still having problems, or have any questions, post 'em in this topic and we'll do what we can to help. <
Go to Top of Page

loftwork
Starting Member

10 Posts

Posted - 13 November 2008 :  11:00:47  Show Profile
Thanks Anon. I'll check for patches (thought .06 was totally bulletproof!) but assume from your reply that moving the forum directory or encrypting it should not normally be necessary.

Cheers,

Rick<
Go to Top of Page

AnonJr
Moderator

United States
5768 Posts

Posted - 13 November 2008 :  11:08:29  Show Profile  Visit AnonJr's Homepage
The only way they can get at the code or upload a modified MDB file is to have access to your server. At that point you have bigger issues.

Now I am assuming that you didn't modify the code to allow for file uploads...<
Go to Top of Page

Podge
Support Moderator

Ireland
3776 Posts

Posted - 13 November 2008 :  12:06:01  Show Profile  Send Podge an ICQ Message  Send Podge a Yahoo! Message
I checked and Gatekeeper is working as it should. Try changing the question & answer to something else. Not everyone would know the answer to your question.<

Podge.

The Hunger Site - Click to donate free food | My Blog | Snitz 3.4.05 AutoInstall (Beta!)

My Mods: CAPTCHA Mod | GateKeeper Mod
Tutorial: Enable subscriptions on your board

Warning: The post above or below may contain nuts.
Go to Top of Page

loftwork
Starting Member

10 Posts

Posted - 13 November 2008 :  12:38:02  Show Profile
Thank you both very much. Would it be prudent to make the mdb writeable only by the machine user account (the name of which escapes me)? Would that be an NTFS Write or eXecute permission?

Cheers,
Rick<
Go to Top of Page

AnonJr
Moderator

United States
5768 Posts

Posted - 13 November 2008 :  13:24:15  Show Profile  Visit AnonJr's Homepage
The account is IUSER_(machine name) - unless they have access to your server, everything done via the web is going to be done by that account anyway.<
Go to Top of Page

Carefree
Advanced Member

Philippines
4217 Posts

Posted - 13 November 2008 :  17:12:48  Show Profile
quote:
Originally posted by AnonJr

The account is IUSER_(machine name) - unless they have access to your server, everything done via the web is going to be done by that account anyway.



Not quite, Anon. It's IUSR_<
Go to Top of Page

AnonJr
Moderator

United States
5768 Posts

Posted - 13 November 2008 :  17:40:25  Show Profile  Visit AnonJr's Homepage
Mental spell check was a little overactive. I've been editing online presentations for the better part of the day.<
Go to Top of Page

loftwork
Starting Member

10 Posts

Posted - 14 November 2008 :  03:34:10  Show Profile
Thanks for the clarification, much appreciated!

Rick


<
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Snitz Forums 2000 © 2000-2021 Snitz™ Communications Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.35 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07