Snitz Forums 2000
Snitz Forums 2000
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Help Groups for Snitz Forums 2000 Users
 Help: General / Classic ASP versions(v3.4.XX)
 Starting with XP
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

johnhardy
Starting Member

United Kingdom
24 Posts

Posted - 24 September 2002 :  11:29:54  Show Profile
I downloaded the latest version of snitz today and cant get default.asp running.
Im using XP Pro, Access, ODBC and the connection string in config.asp is
strConnString ="snitz" (DSN) just to get running.
Im also using UD4 (dreamweaver)
The error I get is as follows, sounds like it cant find the database but the connection is OK. Ive done plenty of these.

Has any one any ideas where I am wrong please.
Thanks John

Error Type:
ADODB.Field (0x800A0BCD)
Either BOF or EOF is True, or the current record has been deleted. Requested operation requires a current record.
/Snitz/TMPdn1df2y7dm.asp, line 95


Roland
Advanced Member

Netherlands
9335 Posts

Posted - 24 September 2002 :  12:32:00  Show Profile
have you edited any files with Dreamweaver? If so: get a clean file and make the changes again this time with a text editor such as Notepad, SourceEdit (http://www.sourceedit.com) or Homesite.

Also, run setup.asp before you go to default.asp

Last thing: you don't need a DSN for local testing. It's just as easy, if not easier, to use either the strConnString using the Vritual Path, or the full path.
Go to Top of Page

johnhardy
Starting Member

United Kingdom
24 Posts

Posted - 24 September 2002 :  12:50:08  Show Profile
Many Thanks FrutZle

I ran the setup.asp and it was away.

The original setting were all OK and I prefer to use a dsn as I seem to have less problems with this method.

Thanks again

John
Go to Top of Page

Roland
Advanced Member

Netherlands
9335 Posts

Posted - 24 September 2002 :  13:53:24  Show Profile
You're welcome

I've never had any problems using a DSN-less connection, but to each his own
Go to Top of Page

ruirib
Snitz Forums Admin

Portugal
26364 Posts

Posted - 24 September 2002 :  16:46:33  Show Profile  Send ruirib a Yahoo! Message
quote:
Originally posted by johnhardy

(...) I prefer to use a dsn as I seem to have less problems with this method.



OLEDB drivers are faster and more robust than ODBC drivers (the ones used in DSN connections). I would always recommend OLEDB over ODBC.


Snitz 3.4 Readme | Like the support? Support Snitz too
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Snitz Forums 2000 © 2000-2021 Snitz™ Communications Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.4 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07