| Author |
 Topic  |
|
mutts
Starting Member
Australia
12 Posts |
 Posted - 09 February 2001 : 07:46:59
|
Well, I'll add my 2 cents worth as well.
I work for a very large Australian Web hosting co, our web servers are host header box's sliced up in to 500 sitse per box
(box specs:pIII 550 256 MB ram, running win2k, IIS5) on one box that I look after there are 200 sites that use snitz. these box's have an average uptime of 25 days.
reason being is the the back end is running on a Seperate sql 7/2000 box.
Any Stability issues that people have can usualy be traced to ms access 2 main reasons.
1. access can only sustain 15 - 20 simultaneous conections before it starts suck more CPU time.
2. Access's implementation of its SQL support is poor at best, Microsoft have recognised this and for this reason MS Office 10 will finaly see the end of the *.mdb file extension. In office 10 Access will be running a cut down SQL engine similar to the way that office server extensions.
Sorry for being so long winded here but I needed to set the record straight. Access is more often the culprit, I can tell you this from experience.
Regards
Chris |
 |
|
|
brkonthru
Development Team Member
Jordan
69 Posts |
Posted - 09 February 2001 : 14:21:28
|
Why do they have an uptime of 25 days? Does it crash or the memory usage goes way up and you have to restart the machine?
|
|
|
|
mutts
Starting Member
Australia
12 Posts |
Posted - 12 February 2001 : 04:14:13
|
quote:
Why do they have an uptime of 25 days? Does it crash or the memory usage goes way up and you have to restart the machine?
The main reasion for only having an uptime of 25 days is problems with the statistics software that we run. As well as things like DLL and COM object registration add to the need to reboot box's
Regards
Chris |
|
|
|
efourie
New Member
USA
80 Posts |
Posted - 23 March 2001 : 22:48:52
|
Don't get me wrong - I think Snitz is awesome, and so does my members. I have a quick comment: I have read a book on ASP coding, and the writer claims that coding a site with Response.write is twice as fast as going back and forth between ASP and HTML.
Do you have any plans to change this for Snitz in the future?
|
|
|
|
Nathan L
New Member
USA
83 Posts |
Posted - 24 March 2001 : 00:19:34
|
quote:
Don't get me wrong - I think Snitz is awesome, and so does my members. I have a quick comment: I have read a book on ASP coding, and the writer claims that coding a site with Response.write is twice as fast as going back and forth between ASP and HTML.
Do you have any plans to change this for Snitz in the future?
Yes, I believe this is slowly being done.
Response.Write ("The Reign of Nice") |
|
|
|
RichardKinser
Snitz Forums Admin
USA
16655 Posts |
Posted - 24 March 2001 : 00:51:26
|
| If you look at the latest alpha, default.asp has been converted to use Response.Write instead of a mixture of ASP and HTML. |
|
|
|
brkonthru
Development Team Member
Jordan
69 Posts |
Posted - 24 March 2001 : 12:27:04
|
One drawback to having convert a lot of the HTML to response.write is it will be hard to customize the code in HTML editors, does anyone know a way to over come this?
|
|
|
|
efourie
New Member
USA
80 Posts |
Posted - 24 March 2001 : 15:03:18
|
I use a cobmination of both FrontPage for visual and Visual Interdev for ASP.
Thanks for doing this - I am sure we will see the improvement. I am busy creating my first mod.
|
|
|
|
Topic |
|
Topic Locked
