Snitz Forums 2000
Snitz Forums 2000
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Help Groups for Snitz Forums 2000 Users
 Help: General / Classic ASP versions(v3.4.XX)
 Forum Admin unable to log in after server upgrade

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!
Before posting, make sure you have read this topic!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Nick Feakes Posted - 25 March 2020 : 19:33:34
Following an upgrade to our server if I as (forum admin) try to login I get the message
"500 - Internal server error.
There is a problem with the resource you are looking for, and it cannot be displayed."
Prior to the upgrade I shut down the forum and the website that contains it.
This morning I can access the website but any attempt to log in was met with the 500 .... message. I can log in as an ordinary member (mLev=1) and can create a test topic (I shouldn't be able to as the board should still be shut down), the message does not appear to post, after a while the 500 ... message reappears. If I go back a page the message is correctly displayed.
I am assuming they copied the forum before I shut it down and now one or more files find the "forum down / forum up" conflict if I log in as admin.
Is there any way I can restart the board without being logged in as Admin? I can access the forum files via ftp.
All help gratefully received
Nick

15   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
HuwR Posted - 13 June 2020 : 22:15:41
the snitz classicforum uses AspEmail here, so yes I am familiar with it
Nick Feakes Posted - 08 June 2020 : 13:29:17
Huw, any progress?
I am going to try AspEmail if I can arrange for the necessary files to be loaded on to the server. Do you have any experience of that service?
Nick
HuwR Posted - 26 May 2020 : 07:28:34
that is a bit strange, I would expect them to have similar send times. I'll fire up a VM and do some testing using cdo to see if I can determine a reason for the difference.
Nick Feakes Posted - 25 May 2020 : 18:23:45
Huw
Thank you, that ruins that theory!
I don't see any error messages.
I have recorded the send times for one of our forums, it takes around 5-6 seconds to send each subscriber an email (a very constant figure for each subscriber), which fits in with the total time to complete a topic with 11 subscribers of almost a minute before control is returned to the poster. With subscriptions turned off it only takes about 2 seconds. Is there anything I can do to track down why it takes so long? Sending an email to myself from within the forum software completes within a second or two so why should emails generated from inc_subscription.asp takes so much longer?
Nick
HuwR Posted - 25 May 2020 : 17:36:12
could you try sending an email manually to a user, if it errors you should then get an error message which may point us in the right direction.
HuwR Posted - 25 May 2020 : 17:30:38
do you see any other errors, you can't actually open the address in a browser which is perhaps the error you see, it is a namespace not an actual address, so that probably isn't the actual problem (it may be)
HuwR Posted - 25 May 2020 : 17:20:12
[quote]Huw
I may have stumbled across the issue that is slowing down the emails. We use CDOSYS and in inc_mail.asp there are several lines of code (around line 124) that call for field updates e.g. "http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpauthenticate" this page no longer exists producing the message "The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable". I have tried to locate an alternate page but so far no luck.
Is it essential to keep updating these fields? Are there any default settings I could use?
As always, all help gratefully received.
Nick[/quote=Originally posted by Nick Feakes]

I'll have a dig around and let you know
Nick Feakes Posted - 25 May 2020 : 12:19:14
Huw
I may have stumbled across the issue that is slowing down the emails. We use CDOSYS and in inc_mail.asp there are several lines of code (around line 124) that call for field updates e.g. "http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpauthenticate" this page no longer exists producing the message "The resource you are looking for has been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable". I have tried to locate an alternate page but so far no luck.
Is it essential to keep updating these fields? Are there any default settings I could use?
As always, all help gratefully received.
Nick
HuwR Posted - 23 May 2020 : 07:48:14
.net version is not really asp.net it is uses .Net MVC Razor engine. This means most of the backend code is compiled as dll's so you will need a copy of Visual Studio (there is a free community edition) if you wish to change any core code. Pages templates however can be tweaked without the need for VS, the templates look a little like classic app pages, it just uses C# rather than VB, but is fairly easy to get in to.

TBH, it has most of what anyone would require without the need to learn any coding.
Nick Feakes Posted - 22 May 2020 : 13:20:17
Thank you Huw, I was afraid you might say something like that. I guess I had better start learning asp.net
Nick
HuwR Posted - 22 May 2020 : 10:09:23
unfortunately this is a problem with the classic version since subscription emails are sent in the same process, so it will have to wait to send ALL subscription emails before returning control to the user, This process seriously impacts the time taken when posting, depending on how many subs etc. There really isn't much you can do about that in classic asp.

The .Net version processes all subscriptions in the background, so control returns straight back to the user regardless of how many subscriptions it is processing.
Nick Feakes Posted - 21 May 2020 : 22:07:15
A further issue has arisen with the subscription system. I have been getting complaints from our users about the length of time it takes from clicking "Submit reply" to the process completing with the usual thank you message. I have recorded as much as 55 seconds during testing. I turned off all subscriptions and we are back to just a few seconds as before. With subscriptions allowed by topic only it is a little slower but that may be due to internet traffic etc but if I allow subscriptions by forum it takes 40 or more seconds. Our subscription database file only contains 186 lines with several of those being the same member id with subscriptions to more that one forum, so only a small list. The database file looks OK, I see nothing strange. Is it possible that one of the member's email addresses is very slow to send for some reason? I have not had any bounce back for several months.
Anything you can think of I could try or test?
Nick
HuwR Posted - 04 April 2020 : 07:11:51
That's a strange one. Glad you got it sorted out.
Nick Feakes Posted - 03 April 2020 : 14:20:26
Resolved. The subscriptions database table had somehow become corrupted, Easy to test, simply turn off all subscriptions in "Admin options - Feature configuration" and everything returned to normal. I found some obviously incorrect entries (e.g. non existent forum numbers) and deleted those but it still created errors so I deleted all the entries and asked everyone to re-subscribe.
Nick
HuwR Posted - 27 March 2020 : 13:49:44
there must be a function somewhere that is failing

Snitz Forums 2000 © 2000-2021 Snitz™ Communications Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.06 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07