T O P I C R E V I E W |
Etymon |
Posted - 24 October 2009 : 22:21:45 What do you all think about this open-source approach?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33463174/ns/technology_and_science-internet/ |
6 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Doug G |
Posted - 27 October 2009 : 15:24:43 I've spent too much time on this list :)
http://php.opensourcecms.com/general/ratings.php
|
Davio |
Posted - 26 October 2009 : 21:54:30 lol yes, that reworked fork of Mambo. I was using mambo till the devs split and made joomla and so I moved to joomla.
Joomla and Drupal are the more popular CMS's I hear about, so hence I wanted to know what was newer. Never heard of ModX. Looks good tho. |
AnonJr |
Posted - 26 October 2009 : 21:31:54 quote: Originally posted by Doug G
And being an older and stable technology is a "good thing", not a complaint.
Hear hear. I for one aspire to become old and stodgy myself.  |
Doug G |
Posted - 26 October 2009 : 21:22:27 quote: So what are you considering new in CMS? Joomla?
Joomla? You mean that reworked fork of Mambo? It's old and stable too. And being an older and stable technology is a "good thing", not a complaint.
Anyway, technologically speaking I think ModX 2 (the Revolution version currently in beta) is much more cutting-edge than any other cms app I've looked at. The 1.x versions are interesting too.
|
Davio |
Posted - 26 October 2009 : 00:50:27 So what are you considering new in CMS? Joomla? |
Doug G |
Posted - 26 October 2009 : 00:25:14 drupal is an old established and very popular php-based cms. I set up a testing drupal site on IIS/windows some years ago and played with it for a while. I think it's a decent choice for a high-traffic site like http://www.whitehouse.gov but it's far from the "This is state-of-the-art technology and the government is a participant in it." quote taken from the article. Drupal is old, stodgy, and reliable technology, just what you want on a busy site.
I like it that the administration is giving a nice public shout-out to open-source applications.
|