| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| TSAloha |
Posted - 10 February 2009 : 12:58:45
Has anyone notice any performance impact for your web site between these 2 major anti-virus sw installed?
Am curious as I think I am experiencing a bette performance in downloading web pages with McAfee, esp. with IE8, which I just installed after removing Norton Internet Security. (It's free for me with my ISP)
< |
| 6 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| TSAloha |
Posted - 11 February 2009 : 17:41:49
Thanks Rui. Ignorance is a blessing here at Snitz - always being helped!< |
| ruirib |
Posted - 11 February 2009 : 16:52:57
nod 32 is another AV product, Taku.
I'm currently using VIPRE. Very small footprint, good price for unlimited home installs, good reviews.< |
| TSAloha |
Posted - 11 February 2009 : 16:25:56
Sorry Doug, I guess I don't speak this language. What does it mean?
quote:
Originally posted by Doug G
norton vs. mcafee = nod32
< |
| Doug G |
Posted - 10 February 2009 : 19:31:00
norton vs. mcafee = nod32< |
| TSAloha |
Posted - 10 February 2009 : 14:20:48
Primarily on my PC - which is XP Pro and have IIS5.1 and also has SQL Server 2005.
Looked at both f-secure and Panda AV... good recommendation, thanks. I get McAfee free so I will be ok with it. (Actually, to think about it, it may not be totally "free" though offered as at no cost. Hidden costs are probably bundled into a monthly internet service fee... nothing is really free. )
< |
| Podge |
Posted - 10 February 2009 : 13:41:27
Are you talking about installing it on the server or on your home pc ?
I would recommend f-secure for a server (cheap licences) and Panda AV for a home pc.< |
