Snitz Forums 2000
Snitz Forums 2000
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Community Forums
 Code Support: ASP (Non-Forum Related)
 Select Issues

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!
Before posting, make sure you have read this topic!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

 
   

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Carefree Posted - 29 April 2012 : 15:50:17
I have three issues.
  1. Select distinct values for one field if ALL values for another field are identical - like this:

    SELECT DISTINCT A, B FROM TABLE WHERE (ALL B=1)

  2. Identify whether values are repeated in a column, if certain other conditions are also met - like this:

    SELECT DISTINCT A, B FROM TABLE WHERE (C>'' AND B='') GROUP BY B HAVING COUNT(*) > 1

  3. Identify distinct values when values in another column are repeated - like this:

    SELECT DISTINCT A, B FROM TABLE GROUP BY (B HAVING COUNT(*) > 1) ORDER BY A ASC



Whenever I use "GROUP BY", w3wp.exe freezes until it times out. Anyone have a clue why?
15   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Carefree Posted - 13 May 2012 : 11:47:09
That solved it! Thanks you two.
ruirib Posted - 12 May 2012 : 06:07:25
quote:
Originally posted by HuwR

Your HAVING clause should come after the GROUP BY not BEFORE

so the sub query would be (SELECT INCIDENT_GT FROM INCIDENTS GROUP BY INCIDENT_GT HAVING COUNT(*)>1)


That was my mistake, I typed the SQL without even testing it.

It does work when the syntax error is corrected (I have also corrected it in my original reply).
HuwR Posted - 12 May 2012 : 02:13:40
Your HAVING clause should come after the GROUP BY not BEFORE

so the sub query would be (SELECT INCIDENT_GT FROM INCIDENTS GROUP BY INCIDENT_GT HAVING COUNT(*)>1)
Carefree Posted - 11 May 2012 : 02:37:29
Sorry for long pauses, they're keeping me very busy. The cognitive people say the rate of deterioration has slowed, so maybe this helps.

Anyway, sure. Sample DB

Example of 3:
SELECT DISTINCT INCIDENT_SU FROM INCIDENTS WHERE INCIDENT_GT IN (SELECT INCIDENT_GT FROM INCIDENTS HAVING COUNT(*)>1 GROUP BY INCIDENT_GT)
ruirib Posted - 06 May 2012 : 17:23:05
Maybe if you give an example table?
Carefree Posted - 06 May 2012 : 16:59:51
Sorry for my delay in replying, I've been trying to make it work (without success).
ruirib Posted - 02 May 2012 : 18:19:49
The subquery would be something like (SELECT B FROM TABLE GROUP BY B HAVING COUNT(*)>1) and the overall query could be:

SELECT DISTINCT A FROM TABLE WHERE B IN (SELECT B FROM TABLE GROUP BY B HAVING COUNT(*)>1 )

I did this without testing, so it may actually need a bit of testing to make sure it would work as you'd want.
Carefree Posted - 02 May 2012 : 16:10:10
Yes, it does. Have an example of how to handle 3?
ruirib Posted - 02 May 2012 : 10:32:01
Does your table have a primary key? If it does, 1. and 3. can be solved using IN and a subquery.
Carefree Posted - 02 May 2012 : 10:05:55
No, didn't work. Same result. Thanks for trying.
HuwR Posted - 02 May 2012 : 09:29:56
You wouldn't normally use a DISTINCT clause that way, if you are using groupby since grouping by stuff is very similar to requesting distinct anyway

instead try doing something like

SELECT A, B FROM TABLE WHERE (C>'' AND B='') GROUP BY B HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT A) > 1



Carefree Posted - 02 May 2012 : 09:05:25
They just freeze until they timeout. I think using ALL in #1 tells it that I'm retarded but #2 & #3 are due to using "distinct AND group by" in the same query, but I haven't found anything saying that I shouldn't.
HuwR Posted - 02 May 2012 : 06:27:30
when you execute them, do they error or just not return what you were expecting?
Carefree Posted - 02 May 2012 : 02:29:44
Yes
HuwR Posted - 02 May 2012 : 02:00:57
are those exactly as you have executed them ?

Snitz Forums 2000 © 2000-2021 Snitz™ Communications Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.07 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07