| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| ruirib |
Posted - 18 July 2007 : 11:05:46
Seems interesting and we all know the risks with browsers, these days.
http://www.hautesecure.com/< |
| 9 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Max0005 |
Posted - 20 July 2007 : 02:58:06
I'll try it out when Firefox support comes out. < |
| AnonJr |
Posted - 18 July 2007 : 14:36:19
ah. That might be a problem... my home "file server" is a shared drive on my Media center...< |
| ruirib |
Posted - 18 July 2007 : 14:30:23
File sharing stopped working altogether. When I tried to access shared folders, I got:
Not enough server storage is available to process the command
Tried to change the value of IRPStackSize in the registry, but it didn't fix it.< |
| AnonJr |
Posted - 18 July 2007 : 14:01:47
Missed that part. 
What kind of file sharing issues did it cause?< |
| ruirib |
Posted - 18 July 2007 : 13:04:31
Ok, it was causing file sharing issues, had to remove it.< |
| ruirib |
Posted - 18 July 2007 : 12:28:14
I don't think it needs input from the community to work. As they state:
In today’s Internet, malware can lurk on even the most trusted and popular websites. We can keep you safe from attack, even if you’re the first person to stumble upon malware-laced content. How does this work? When the bad content attempts to load, our behavior-based profiling algorithms identify and intercept it in real-time, before it installs itself on your computer.
< |
| AnonJr |
Posted - 18 July 2007 : 11:40:18
Given that it appears to rely heavily on community response its a bit of a chicken/egg problem... it probably won't be too stellar until a community builds up - but it may not hit that critical mass of users due to limitations of the small community.
Unless I misread, and the community component is more for enhancement/refinement.< |
| JJenson |
Posted - 18 July 2007 : 11:32:24
Let me know what you guys think. If you think it works I will give it a try.  < |
| AnonJr |
Posted - 18 July 2007 : 11:20:39
Hmm. I might give it a try.< |
