The Forum has been Updated
The code has been upgraded to the latest .NET core version. Please check instructions in the Community Announcements about migrating your account.
I have noticed the use of:
as a replacement for:
But,
is already an include in both inc_header.asp and inc_header_short.asp, so in a lot of the MODS that I have looked at, it's basically being included twice.
Please go over your MODS and check to make sure that you aren't including:
in any of your files that also have either inc_header.asp or inc_header_short.asp as an include.<
Code:
<!--#INCLUDE FILE="inc_func_common.asp" -->Code:
<!--#INCLUDE FILE="inc_functions.asp" -->Code:
<!--#INCLUDE FILE="inc_func_common.asp" -->Please go over your MODS and check to make sure that you aren't including:
Code:
<!--#INCLUDE FILE="inc_func_common.asp" -->
Posted
Doh! Thanks for the heads up.
@tomic<
@tomic<
Posted
Thanks Richard.
Wouldn't you get an error if the file was included twice? Because I would have fixed that in my mods if an error showed up. Otherwise, I might be guilty of doing that myself.<
Wouldn't you get an error if the file was included twice? Because I would have fixed that in my mods if an error showed up. Otherwise, I might be guilty of doing that myself.<
Posted
Originally posted by Davio
Wouldn't you get an error if the file was included twice? ...
No, it will not cause any errors. Only difference is that whenever a call is made to a function or sub the function/sub in the file which is included last will be executed.<
Posted
I think you only get an error if you have a Dim statement outside of the sub/functions<
Posted
Originally posted by ajhvdbAlso CONST...<
I think you only get an error if you have a Dim statement outside of the sub/functions
Stop the WAR!
<