Count from SQL statement with a JOIN - نوشته شده در (1203 Views)
Junior Member
TastyNutz
مطلب: 251
251
I have the following statement:

"SELECT T_WEBLOG.id, T_COMMENTS.isApproved, T_WEBLOG.b_published FROM T_WEBLOG INNER JOIN T_COMMENTS ON T_WEBLOG.id = T_COMMENTS.c_bID_fk GROUP BY T_WEBLOG.id, T_COMMENTS.isApproved, T_WEBLOG.b_published HAVING (((T_WEBLOG.b_published)=True))"

I need to count isApproved
Code:
WHERE isApproved = false

I just can't get the syntax correct. Can someone help?
 پیش‌فرض مرتب‌سازی برای تاریخ DESC به معنی جدیدترین است  
 تعداد در صفحه 
نوشته شده در
Advanced Member
Carefree
مطلب: 4224
4224
Try this:
Code:
SELECT T_COMMENTS.ISAPPROVED, COUNT(*) AS CNT, T_WEBLOG.ID, T_WEBLOG.B_PUBLISHED FROM T_WEBLOG INNER JOIN T_COMMENTS ON T_WEBLOG.ID = T_COMMENTS.C_BID_FK WHERE T_COMMENTS.ISAPPROVED='FALSE' GROUP BY T_WEBLOG.ID, T_COMMENTS.ISAPPROVED, T_WEBLOG.B_PUBLISHED HAVING (((T_WEBLOG.B_PUBLISHED)=TRUE))
نوشته شده در
Forum Admin
HuwR
مطلب: 20611
20611
it is more efficient to use COUNT(1) rather than COUNT(*)

It can alos be accomplished without using the having clause by doing somtheing like this

Code:

SELECT T_WEBLOG.ID, COUNT(NULLIF( T_COMMENTS.ISAPPROVED, 'False' )) AS UNAPPROVEDCNT, COUNT(NULLIF( T_COMMENTS.ISAPPROVED, 'True' )) AS APPROVEDCNT
FROM T_WEBLOG INNER JOIN T_COMMENTS ON T_WEBLOG.ID = T_COMMENTS.C_BID_FK
WHERE(((T_WEBLOG.B_PUBLISHED)=TRUE))
GROUP BY T_WEBLOG.ID


That should result in something along the lines of

WEBLOGID | UNAPPROVEDCNT | APPROVEDCNT

There is no point in including PUBLISHED in the groupby or output since you are only asking for results where published = true.
obviosuly it is not tested as that would require your tables and data smile This may not work on mySQL as I have no idea if it supports NULLIF (doesn't work in access either)
نوشته شده در
Snitz Forums Admin
ruirib
مطلب: 26364
26364
A bit off discussion, but I am always interested in performance related issues. I always use COUNT(*) because I thought the optimizer would choose the best possible way to compute the count. Turns out that is true for several other variations, including COUNT(1):

http://thehobt.blogspot.com/2008/12/debunking-myth-select-count-vs-select.html

This is obviously valid for SQL Server. Not sure how other DBs handle this situation.
نوشته شده در
Advanced Member
Carefree
مطلب: 4224
4224
NullIf works in MySql
نوشته شده در
Forum Admin
HuwR
مطلب: 20611
20611
Originally posted by ruirib
A bit off discussion, but I am always interested in performance related issues. I always use COUNT(*) because I thought the optimizer would choose the best possible way to compute the count. Turns out that is true for several other variations, including COUNT(1):

http://thehobt.blogspot.com/2008/12/debunking-myth-select-count-vs-select.html

This is obviously valid for SQL Server. Not sure how other DBs handle this situation.
the most pertinant reason for using cont(1) is incase there are any null values in the column you are trying to count as it will not include them if there are, so just safer to use count(1) just incase smile
نوشته شده در
Snitz Forums Admin
ruirib
مطلب: 26364
26364
COUNT(*) counts NULLs, Huw: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175997.aspx

That does make sense too, as * is not really an expression, so the end result of it's use is that the query result will simply be the row count.
A quick google search will show that using COUNT(*) or COUNT(1) is implemented the same way for other DBs too, like Oracle.
نوشته شده در
Forum Admin
HuwR
مطلب: 20611
20611
Originally posted by ruirib
COUNT(*) counts NULLs, Huw: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175997.aspx

That does make sense too, as * is not really an expression, so the end result of it's use is that the query result will simply be the row count.
A quick google search will show that using COUNT(*) or COUNT(1) is implemented the same way for other DBs too, like Oracle.
cool, I'm obviously too used to older databases where (1) was more efficient than (*), better change my ways
نوشته شده در
Junior Member
TastyNutz
مطلب: 251
251
Thanks everyone.
2 notes:
Carefree gave me what I was asking for. But turns out it's not quite what I need. Huwr, in your statement, both APPROVEDCNT and UNAPPROVEDCNT return only the total of T_COMMENTS.
I'm still working...
 
شما باید یک متن وارد کنید