Server costs? - نوشته شده در (1558 Views)
Advanced Member
Etymon
مطلب: 2396
2396
LOL! This topic is not about hosting as a business. These questions are about getting a server for my private use, for learning, and for planning.
I want to get a server to host my own sites, but I don't know anything about servers. What is the best way to go about dabbling into it to figure out whether or not it is something I want to get further into without breaking the bank just to experiment?
 پیش‌فرض مرتب‌سازی برای تاریخ DESC به معنی جدیدترین است  
 تعداد در صفحه 
نوشته شده در
Support Moderator
Doug G
مطلب: 6493
6493
I have a few Dell servers that I'm quite happy with. Right now you can pick up a low-end Dell with no OS for about $300.00 US. I do my web hosting and experimentation with linux, so there is no OS cost.
If you have any computers of sufficient horsepower you can usually put a server OS on and voila, instant "server". What makes a server is software, when you buy a "server" usually that implies more rugged hardware, maybe raid disks, and no multimedia stuff, otherwise a server is pretty much another pc.
======
Doug G
======
Computer history and help at www.dougscode.com
نوشته شده در
Advanced Member
Etymon
مطلب: 2396
2396
Thanks Doug. blush
So, like if I wanted to do the Snitz route, I guess I'd have to go with the Microsoft stuff. Is that going to be a big headache?
نوشته شده در
Support Moderator
Podge
مطلب: 3776
3776
Internet Information Server (IIS) comes with various editions of Windows. Its not hard to administer and IMHO a lot easier to administer than Apache.
http://www.iis.net

If you want to try Apache this is a good way to get started - http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html
نوشته شده در
Advanced Member
JJenson
مطلب: 2121
2121
Personally we got a server like doug was saying and just put Vista Home Premium and works perfect. I even had a client do it after hearing I was for 1 of their small sites. IIS 7 is pretty easy to learn I love it.
نوشته شده در
Advanced Member
Etymon
مطلب: 2396
2396
Thanks a lot guys!
So, what kind of prices and I am looking at for all of this?
نوشته شده در
Advanced Member
JJenson
مطلب: 2121
2121
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=2864283&CatId=3778

this is $110 and you can get a decent machine from dell for probably $350 so you are looking at $450 give or take $50 probably.
نوشته شده در
Advanced Member
Etymon
مطلب: 2396
2396
Kewl! ... Thanks Jeff!
Ah, ok, next question involves security.
I have a long-time friend, who is a linux proponent. He vehemently abhors Microsoft products. He has told me that Microsoft boxes are much easier to hack than linux boxes, and it happens all of the time.
What is up with this?
نوشته شده در
Advanced Member
JJenson
مطلب: 2121
2121
You have heard of propaganda right? I have seen linux boxes hacked just as well as windows boxes. The rule of thumb is only allow the ports you need open. Close the rest of them off.

Next time he says that ask him the circumstances of windows boxes that always get hacked? Also ask him how those linux boxes are so much superior in security?
I would bet he cannot give you solid answers on those.
نوشته شده در
Average Member
cripto9t
مطلب: 881
881
First off, I know very little about this subject, so take what I say with a grain of salt. this is a newbe talking ;).
For the last 5 months I've been using my laptop with xp pro with iis 5 to host a small (23 members) private nfl forum for me and my cyber buddies.
xp pro is limited to 10 connections and all the members know this. I asked them to say something when they can't connect. So far I've only had one report.

I knew when I started hosting it, that when football season started 10 connections would not be enough. I watched ebay and was able to score a used copy of microsoft server 2003 with 5 CALs (I think thats the number of web sites allowed) for $34. I haven't installed it yet but the discs are ready to go.
Just thought I'd let you know what this newbe is doing smile.
    _-/Cripto9t\-_
نوشته شده در
Support Moderator
Doug G
مطلب: 6493
6493
linux is inherently more difficult to hack because of the underlying design of the OS, but it's not impossible and if you do get hacked it can be much more difficult to clean up. But remember also that unix/linux has had maybe 20 years more practice at securing systems than windows has. Unix was being hacked before windows was invented. All those years of experience also help unix/linux be secure.
Windows has ten times the attack vectors that linux does, put together with it's popularity makes windows more vulnerable. Windows is getting better but it's still riskier, particularly if not administered by an experienced security admin.




======
Doug G
======
Computer history and help at www.dougscode.com
شما باید یک متن وارد کنید