Count from SQL statement with a JOIN - Posted (1202 Views)
Junior Member
TastyNutz
Posts: 251
251
I have the following statement:

"SELECT T_WEBLOG.id, T_COMMENTS.isApproved, T_WEBLOG.b_published FROM T_WEBLOG INNER JOIN T_COMMENTS ON T_WEBLOG.id = T_COMMENTS.c_bID_fk GROUP BY T_WEBLOG.id, T_COMMENTS.isApproved, T_WEBLOG.b_published HAVING (((T_WEBLOG.b_published)=True))"

I need to count isApproved
Code:
WHERE isApproved = false

I just can't get the syntax correct. Can someone help?
 Sort direction, for dates DESC means newest first  
 Page size 
Posted
Advanced Member
Carefree
Posts: 4224
4224
Try this:
Code:
SELECT T_COMMENTS.ISAPPROVED, COUNT(*) AS CNT, T_WEBLOG.ID, T_WEBLOG.B_PUBLISHED FROM T_WEBLOG INNER JOIN T_COMMENTS ON T_WEBLOG.ID = T_COMMENTS.C_BID_FK WHERE T_COMMENTS.ISAPPROVED='FALSE' GROUP BY T_WEBLOG.ID, T_COMMENTS.ISAPPROVED, T_WEBLOG.B_PUBLISHED HAVING (((T_WEBLOG.B_PUBLISHED)=TRUE))
Posted
Forum Admin
HuwR
Posts: 20611
20611
it is more efficient to use COUNT(1) rather than COUNT(*)

It can alos be accomplished without using the having clause by doing somtheing like this

Code:

SELECT T_WEBLOG.ID, COUNT(NULLIF( T_COMMENTS.ISAPPROVED, 'False' )) AS UNAPPROVEDCNT, COUNT(NULLIF( T_COMMENTS.ISAPPROVED, 'True' )) AS APPROVEDCNT
FROM T_WEBLOG INNER JOIN T_COMMENTS ON T_WEBLOG.ID = T_COMMENTS.C_BID_FK
WHERE(((T_WEBLOG.B_PUBLISHED)=TRUE))
GROUP BY T_WEBLOG.ID


That should result in something along the lines of

WEBLOGID | UNAPPROVEDCNT | APPROVEDCNT

There is no point in including PUBLISHED in the groupby or output since you are only asking for results where published = true.
obviosuly it is not tested as that would require your tables and data smile This may not work on mySQL as I have no idea if it supports NULLIF (doesn't work in access either)
Posted
Snitz Forums Admin
ruirib
Posts: 26364
26364
A bit off discussion, but I am always interested in performance related issues. I always use COUNT(*) because I thought the optimizer would choose the best possible way to compute the count. Turns out that is true for several other variations, including COUNT(1):

http://thehobt.blogspot.com/2008/12/debunking-myth-select-count-vs-select.html

This is obviously valid for SQL Server. Not sure how other DBs handle this situation.
Posted
Advanced Member
Carefree
Posts: 4224
4224
NullIf works in MySql
Posted
Forum Admin
HuwR
Posts: 20611
20611
Originally posted by ruirib
A bit off discussion, but I am always interested in performance related issues. I always use COUNT(*) because I thought the optimizer would choose the best possible way to compute the count. Turns out that is true for several other variations, including COUNT(1):

http://thehobt.blogspot.com/2008/12/debunking-myth-select-count-vs-select.html

This is obviously valid for SQL Server. Not sure how other DBs handle this situation.
the most pertinant reason for using cont(1) is incase there are any null values in the column you are trying to count as it will not include them if there are, so just safer to use count(1) just incase smile
Posted
Snitz Forums Admin
ruirib
Posts: 26364
26364
COUNT(*) counts NULLs, Huw: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175997.aspx

That does make sense too, as * is not really an expression, so the end result of it's use is that the query result will simply be the row count.
A quick google search will show that using COUNT(*) or COUNT(1) is implemented the same way for other DBs too, like Oracle.
Posted
Forum Admin
HuwR
Posts: 20611
20611
Originally posted by ruirib
COUNT(*) counts NULLs, Huw: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms175997.aspx

That does make sense too, as * is not really an expression, so the end result of it's use is that the query result will simply be the row count.
A quick google search will show that using COUNT(*) or COUNT(1) is implemented the same way for other DBs too, like Oracle.
cool, I'm obviously too used to older databases where (1) was more efficient than (*), better change my ways
Posted
Junior Member
TastyNutz
Posts: 251
251
Thanks everyone.
2 notes:
Carefree gave me what I was asking for. But turns out it's not quite what I need. Huwr, in your statement, both APPROVEDCNT and UNAPPROVEDCNT return only the total of T_COMMENTS.
I'm still working...
 
You Must enter a message