| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
davidkirk
Junior Member
USA
113 Posts |
 Posted - 25 February 2008 : 13:52:35
|
| My Snitz forum at www.gayrites.net/forum is cosmetically integrated with the site using MS FrontPage "include" pages. I am redesigning the site based on a Dynamic Web Template (current in-progress version with a glitch or two at www.gayrites.net/gayrites.dwt.) When I'm ready to convert the site, I want to be able to attach the DWT to all snitz content pages. (I'll develop a different DWT for the Snitz content to remove the Google skyscraper ad that now appears in a column in the beige-colored "content area" of the current draft DWT and greatly reduce the height of the header graphic.) Can anyone tell me how to do it? |
David Kirk |
|
|
pdrg
Support Moderator
United Kingdom
2897 Posts |
Posted - 25 February 2008 : 17:12:42
|
| I'm not sure about cookie scope with DWT's, and I suspect it may be a messier process than you imagine as it needs to be weaved intoi your page - mayeb the site integration mod would help? |
 |
|
|
davidkirk
Junior Member
USA
113 Posts |
Posted - 25 February 2008 : 19:04:27
|
| Thanks for your response. I forgot to introduce myself as a "rank amateur." So I'm afraid I don't know what you mean by "cookie scope." May I ask for a tad more? Meanwhile, I'll see what I can learn about the site integration mod. |
David Kirk |
|
|
|
pdrg
Support Moderator
United Kingdom
2897 Posts |
Posted - 28 February 2008 : 13:54:51
|
Snitz was never intended to work with DWT's, indeed the core code goes back to well before the first dotcom boom/bust.
Cookies have life and a scope, usually at site level - far too much to explain in a single post, you may find w3c.org helpful if you want to find out how the web works under the covers.
If I were you, I'd investigate the Site Integration Mod, or using a CMS/Nuke for a fully integrated site engine. |
|
|
|
davidkirk
Junior Member
USA
113 Posts |
Posted - 04 March 2008 : 16:47:40
|
| Thanks. Waaay over my bald head. I'm using include pages for the header and footer now so I suppose I'll keep on doing that. Thanks for the info -- at least I understand my options! |
David Kirk |
|
|
|
pdrg
Support Moderator
United Kingdom
2897 Posts |
Posted - 05 March 2008 : 09:06:47
|
| Heh heh, whilst the web looks homogeneous, it really is a mess of ragtag outdated, newfangled, weird, wacky, all sorts of technogies, with precious little compatibility between them. Unless you want to fight-bodge multiple technologies, find one and stick with it (although choosing which best suits your needs is the tricky bit). The current trend is towards using CMS's/Nukes to power sites, it'll change ;-) |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Topic Locked
