Author |
Topic |
Da_Stimulator
DEV Team Forum Moderator
USA
3373 Posts |
|
dayve
Forum Moderator
USA
5820 Posts |
Posted - 15 December 2004 : 18:08:10
|
the real fix is to get away from html tags that are becoming depracated, such as the font tag, and begin using css to control formatting. |
|
Edited by - dayve on 15 December 2004 18:09:45 |
|
|
PeeWee.Inc
Senior Member
United Kingdom
1893 Posts |
Posted - 15 December 2004 : 18:16:19
|
CSS is really a great thing. It'll be great when Snitz moves away from nested tables and use's DIV's and CSS Kinda like Speedball (1,2 and soon to be 3) () |
De Priofundus Calmo Ad Te Damine |
Edited by - PeeWee.Inc on 15 December 2004 18:17:04 |
|
|
Podge
Support Moderator
Ireland
3775 Posts |
|
Da_Stimulator
DEV Team Forum Moderator
USA
3373 Posts |
Posted - 16 December 2004 : 10:03:23
|
I've seen several table-less sites...
but thats not what I'm talking about. I'm just talking about the code & quote tags at the moment, because sometimes when firefox resizes the text, its so small I have to copy & paste just to read it. |
-Stim |
|
|
Doug G
Support Moderator
USA
6493 Posts |
Posted - 16 December 2004 : 16:56:51
|
I've noticed the same thing with FireFox, and not just at this forum.
|
====== Doug G ====== Computer history and help at www.dougscode.com |
|
|
DavidRhodes
Senior Member
United Kingdom
1222 Posts |
Posted - 20 December 2004 : 09:25:22
|
It's more likely to be FireFox doing it correctly and IE letting you off |
The UK MkIVs Forum |
|
|
Doug G
Support Moderator
USA
6493 Posts |
Posted - 20 December 2004 : 16:07:24
|
quote: Originally posted by DavidRhodes
It's more likely to be FireFox doing it correctly and IE letting you off
If so then Firefox's idea of correct is incorrect. :)
|
====== Doug G ====== Computer history and help at www.dougscode.com |
|
|
Davio
Development Team Member
Jamaica
12217 Posts |
Posted - 20 December 2004 : 17:51:00
|
quote: Originally posted by Doug G
If so then Firefox's idea of correct is incorrect. :)
Why? Firefox is more standard compliant than IE. |
Support Snitz Forums
|
|
|
dayve
Forum Moderator
USA
5820 Posts |
Posted - 20 December 2004 : 19:02:30
|
quote: Originally posted by Davio
quote: Originally posted by Doug G
If so then Firefox's idea of correct is incorrect. :)
Why? Firefox is more standard compliant than IE.
which equates to Firefox having less features. |
|
|
|
Davio
Development Team Member
Jamaica
12217 Posts |
Posted - 20 December 2004 : 19:21:01
|
Less features in terms of features of the browser or features the browser can display in websites?
But that wouldn't make Firefox any less of a good browser to use, just because it is standards compliant. If you want a feature rich site using cutting technology, you just have to prepare for only IE users to visit your site. And to understand that majority of the browsers out now are standard compliant and that the browser market is moving away from IE.
There is still a lot you can do with the current standards proposed by the W3C, that can give you a feature rich site.
I can only presume that many web developers have gotten so use to IE's non-standard features and coding that they can't imagine using anything else. |
Support Snitz Forums
|
|
|
dayve
Forum Moderator
USA
5820 Posts |
Posted - 20 December 2004 : 22:10:51
|
I prefer the "rich fat" experience ... this is coming from a users point of view, not a developers, although I'll have to admit, I love all the extra stuff you can do with web development using IE. I just don't jump on bandwagons that easily like a lot of people I know that did with Opera and Firefox. I'm not a Microsoft Hater either so I don't look for alternatives... I'm immensely happy with the Microsoft products I use so I'll stick with it. I only use Firefox, Opera and Netscape to ensure my sites work sufficiently with those browsers. |
|
|
|
Da_Stimulator
DEV Team Forum Moderator
USA
3373 Posts |
Posted - 20 December 2004 : 23:46:17
|
Da_Stimulator Member: "Anti-Microsoft Cult" Although I was checking out Microsoft's project code-named "Longhorn".... |
-Stim |
Edited by - Da_Stimulator on 20 December 2004 23:47:17 |
|
|
dayve
Forum Moderator
USA
5820 Posts |
Posted - 21 December 2004 : 00:32:32
|
all anti-Microsoft people should refrain from using ALL Microsoft products... let's see how long you last. |
|
|
|
DavidRhodes
Senior Member
United Kingdom
1222 Posts |
Posted - 21 December 2004 : 08:53:35
|
I'm not anti-microsoft, but find that if you code for FireFox, chances are it'll work in other browsers. It's IE's CSS implementation that causes the problems, sure you've heard of the "box model problem", MS, in there infinite wisdom, decide to change the meaning of height/width! |
The UK MkIVs Forum |
|
|
Doug G
Support Moderator
USA
6493 Posts |
Posted - 21 December 2004 : 21:38:41
|
I don't really care if it's a standards thing or not, I have to squint too much to read quotes with Firefox. There are standards and there is usability and being able to read the screen is usability. If firefox is rendering 100% properly and IE is not, then this thread belongs in the forum bugs forum :)
Anyone know the applicable standard to this difference in text size rendering between IE and Firefox?
|
====== Doug G ====== Computer history and help at www.dougscode.com |
|
|
Topic |
|