Snitz Forums 2000
Snitz Forums 2000
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Community Forums
 Community Discussions (All other subjects)
 firewall (anti-IP spoofing)
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

chumbawumba
Junior Member

United Kingdom
304 Posts

Posted - 20 May 2004 :  18:39:00  Show Profile
My norton internet security subscription ran out recently, I changed my firewall to a different one called sygate personal firewall pro. One of the config options for this application is to enable "anti-IP spoofing", the help file defines this as:
quote:

IP spoofing is a process used by hackers to hijack a communication session between two computers, which we will call Computers A and B. A hacker can send a data packet that causes Computer A to drop the communication. Then, pretending to be Computer A, the hacker can communicate with Computer B, thus hijacking a communication session and attempting to attack Computer B.

Anti-IP spoofing foils most IP spoofing attempts by randomizing the sequence numbers of each communication packet, preventing a hacker from anticipating a packet and intercepting it.



This feature is disabled by default. Is it useful for a home user ? I dont know much about hacking / network security but it sounds like a useful feature. does anyone use it?

sr_erick
Senior Member

USA
1318 Posts

Posted - 20 May 2004 :  18:53:47  Show Profile  Visit sr_erick's Homepage  Send sr_erick a Yahoo! Message
I don't care for any software based personal firewalls. Run a cheap linksys router between you and the Internet and you will be fine. I've never had any problems with hacking on my personal computers, ever.




Erick
Snowmobile Fanatics


Edited by - sr_erick on 20 May 2004 18:54:03
Go to Top of Page

Davio
Development Team Member

Jamaica
12217 Posts

Posted - 20 May 2004 :  20:50:20  Show Profile
Hmm, that doesn't help him much, now does it sr_erick?

Chumbawumba, I wouldn't worry about it too much. Maybe if you were a popular organization who is worried about security and thier communications being hijacked. But hackers/crackers don't usually go after single home users.

As long as you are running a firewall, be it a hardware or software firewall, along with an antivirus and an anti-spyware program, you should be ok.

If you want to feel a little bit safer, no harm in turning it on.

Support Snitz Forums
Go to Top of Page

sr_erick
Senior Member

USA
1318 Posts

Posted - 20 May 2004 :  23:00:33  Show Profile  Visit sr_erick's Homepage  Send sr_erick a Yahoo! Message
Oh it helps. Router/NAT is all you need...unless they hack into that, but really...it's large companies they want to go after. Home users don't have anything interesting enough.




Erick
Snowmobile Fanatics

Go to Top of Page

chumbawumba
Junior Member

United Kingdom
304 Posts

Posted - 21 May 2004 :  06:19:32  Show Profile
ok thanks for clarifying that
Go to Top of Page

Roland
Advanced Member

Netherlands
9335 Posts

Posted - 21 May 2004 :  10:31:13  Show Profile
quote:
Originally posted by chumbawumba

My norton internet security subscription ran out recently, I changed my firewall to a different one called sygate personal firewall pro.


You might want to run a few tests for Sygate's protection. I've found it highly disappointing, especially after it failed several of the tests on Sygate's own site and on PCFlank.

I went back to using Outpost, and installed Sygate PF on my brother computer as he doesn't use it too often.
Go to Top of Page

chumbawumba
Junior Member

United Kingdom
304 Posts

Posted - 21 May 2004 :  13:57:57  Show Profile
really ?! Were you testing version 5.5 ? Sygate's test and ShieldsUP reported no problems.

I couldn't get any joy from PCFlank as i kept getting this message:

quote:

The test has found that the IP address used by your computer cannot be scanned. This commonly occurs because of a firewall program on your computer and/or you are connected to the Internet through a proxy-server or your ISP uses Network Address Translation (NAT) to share IP addresses.



seems like an odd message to get considering that it is designed to test a firewall !

but anyway the equivalent symantec test failed me on a number issues.

flippin heck......might put NIS back on.....

Go to Top of Page

Roland
Advanced Member

Netherlands
9335 Posts

Posted - 21 May 2004 :  14:33:50  Show Profile
I had the latest & "greatest" version. The interface looked/felt like that of an old Windows 95 app. too, and the options were a major disappointment.

Can't say I tried hard to configure it, though from an application like that, I do expect it to work right from the start, and it just didn't.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Snitz Forums 2000 © 2000-2021 Snitz™ Communications Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.32 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07