Snitz Forums 2000
Snitz Forums 2000
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Community Forums
 Community Discussions (All other subjects)
 Server specs for this site
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

e3stone
Average Member

USA
885 Posts

Posted - 28 October 2002 :  17:10:34  Show Profile  Send e3stone an AOL message
This is probably addressed to Huw (you are hosting this site, right?) but I was just wondering the specs on the application & DB server. How much memory, CPU, etc. Just curious.

<-- Eric -->

HuwR
Forum Admin

United Kingdom
20595 Posts

Posted - 29 October 2002 :  07:11:51  Show Profile  Visit HuwR's Homepage
They are dual pIII 750's with 1Gb of ram.
Go to Top of Page

Gremlin
General Help Moderator

New Zealand
7528 Posts

Posted - 29 October 2002 :  09:36:12  Show Profile  Visit Gremlin's Homepage
A pretty common configuration for MS Servers, offers pleanty of 'grunt'

Kiwihosting.Net - The Forum Hosting Specialists
Go to Top of Page

pdrg
Support Moderator

United Kingdom
2897 Posts

Posted - 29 October 2002 :  09:55:26  Show Profile  Send pdrg a Yahoo! Message
I know SQL server makes good use of >1 processor (even if the per-processor licensing model makes this painful!), but does IIS?
Go to Top of Page

HuwR
Forum Admin

United Kingdom
20595 Posts

Posted - 29 October 2002 :  10:05:51  Show Profile  Visit HuwR's Homepage
yes
Go to Top of Page

snaayk
Senior Member

USA
1061 Posts

Posted - 29 October 2002 :  12:24:25  Show Profile  Visit snaayk's Homepage  Send snaayk an AOL message  Send snaayk an ICQ Message  Send snaayk a Yahoo! Message
Thats good news, I'm moving my intranet site to a dual Xeon 700, 1 GB of Ram, 1MB L2 cache, 4 SCSI HD in a RAID array, and a 14 inch monitor. Oh yeah, and a mouse without a wheel.

Its a welcomed improvement, currently I have a p3 800 with 128 MB ram. And it runs awful. I can barely edit files over the network its so slow.
Go to Top of Page

HuwR
Forum Admin

United Kingdom
20595 Posts

Posted - 29 October 2002 :  12:38:42  Show Profile  Visit HuwR's Homepage
quote:
Originally posted by snaayk

Thats good news, I'm moving my intranet site to a dual Xeon 700, 1 GB of Ram, 1MB L2 cache, 4 SCSI HD in a RAID array, and a 14 inch monitor. Oh yeah, and a mouse without a wheel.

Its a welcomed improvement, currently I have a p3 800 with 128 MB ram. And it runs awful. I can barely edit files over the network its so slow.



your biggest problem there is only having 128mb of ram.

I wouldn't bother withe the added expense of a scsii raid array, ide is just as fast and reliable these days, and a darn site cheaper
Go to Top of Page

snaayk
Senior Member

USA
1061 Posts

Posted - 29 October 2002 :  13:13:30  Show Profile  Visit snaayk's Homepage  Send snaayk an AOL message  Send snaayk an ICQ Message  Send snaayk a Yahoo! Message
quote:
Originally posted by HuwR

quote:
Originally posted by snaayk

Thats good news, I'm moving my intranet site to a dual Xeon 700, 1 GB of Ram, 1MB L2 cache, 4 SCSI HD in a RAID array, and a 14 inch monitor. Oh yeah, and a mouse without a wheel.

Its a welcomed improvement, currently I have a p3 800 with 128 MB ram. And it runs awful. I can barely edit files over the network its so slow.



your biggest problem there is only having 128mb of ram.

I wouldn't bother withe the added expense of a scsii raid array, ide is just as fast and reliable these days, and a darn site cheaper



Its been setting in our server room for a while. It was only being used for 2 access databases that 20 people used!!! It was purchased before i transferred into this position and I came accross it the other day...Im moving the 2 dbs elsewhere and taking over the server. oh yeah, and it has 2 nic cards working in tandem.
Go to Top of Page

seven
Senior Member

USA
1037 Posts

Posted - 29 October 2002 :  13:40:42  Show Profile  Visit seven's Homepage
It always seems to me that companies spend the $ on expensive servers to increase network speed, but always forget to upgrade the itty bitty little 10mb network (cards, cable, hubs, switches.. etc, etc)

It took us forever to convince IT that the issues were network related and not PC or server related. Once we were fully upgraded to the 100mb fiber network, all our problems went away.

Go to Top of Page

snaayk
Senior Member

USA
1061 Posts

Posted - 30 October 2002 :  10:02:32  Show Profile  Visit snaayk's Homepage  Send snaayk an AOL message  Send snaayk an ICQ Message  Send snaayk a Yahoo! Message
quote:
Originally posted by airilm

It always seems to me that companies spend the $ on expensive servers to increase network speed, but always forget to upgrade the itty bitty little 10mb network (cards, cable, hubs, switches.. etc, etc)

It took us forever to convince IT that the issues were network related and not PC or server related. Once we were fully upgraded to the 100mb fiber network, all our problems went away.



Don't get me started on that one! Our infrastructure is setup for 100Mb ethernet...the hubs and routers, though, are only 10Mb...for the entire router and hub, not per port. If you're working at night when everyone else is sleeping then you're good to go. Might as well be gigaethernet, but during the day, forget about it!

Supposedly, the servers get upgraded first (we're migrating to AD in the next few months) then the network. I can complin for days....
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Snitz Forums 2000 © 2000-2021 Snitz™ Communications Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.3 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07