Snitz Forums 2000
Snitz Forums 2000
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Snitz Forums 2000 DEV-Group
 DEV Internationalization (v4-archive)
 PREVIEW not working
 New Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

n/a
deleted

593 Posts

Posted - 27 February 2002 :  21:33:51  Show Profile
quote:

quote:

<====Dixon has deployed a multiple web enviornment using all existing languge packs - see http://www.websitetrans.com/translators/forums2002/
which is very nice for a forum testing whose Forum design concept is very much like globalized web site that I was involved in, but again, there is a major difference between the web site publishing model and BBS model, which is close to auction or other transaction model...for handling multilingual content/messages. I am quite impressed with what you did. You did a tremendous job in internatinalizing Snitz Forum architecture. Since it is already a single globalized dynamic database driven forum, I sense an inssue is handling front end "presentation" side of Forum on web....so my question above.
-----



Hmm. On that site, the (special) Turkish characters are not rendered correctly. I tried all related encodings, including auto. The hardcoded (?) encoding is "charset=utf-8" Can you provide some info what is done there?

You got deep into utf-8 to solve Japanese problems, I think you can help me on this.

Think PinkPost v40b03 Patches



As for webtranslators forum, Dixon can provide you more insights as to what he did. As for i2AsiaForum,
1) I opened 1041.asp in Notepad2002, edited Japanese, and saved it as utf-8 file. In 1041
arrLang (intLangIndexCount,2) = " " is set to "utf-8"
That's basically what I did.

One problem in doing any edit in File Manager window of Brinkster is that only unicode encoding schme setup will allow me to do direct edit and view JA chars properly rendered... and of course in "viewing" web page, it doesn't require any particular encoding adjustment.

I basically followed what Dixon suggested, however, I continue to have problems in properly installing Traditional Chinese, Lang1028.asp...(thus not included in 12AsiaForum) while Dixon has it properly installed...so, I may not have it done fully correctly for deploying it in unicode/utf-8.... So, basically what I did was to do edit necessary file locally and uploaded it to the server rather than doing it directly within Brinkster.

Also, Dixon has Simplified Chinese language deployed in his site. Believe it is a good idea to have both Traditional and Simplified Chinese language packs...(so that mainland China - Simplified Chinese and HK/TWN etc - Traditional are represented). Hope Dixon will respond to your inquiry.

Thanks,
LeoRat

<
Go to Top of Page

Deleted
deleted

4116 Posts

Posted - 28 February 2002 :  05:47:20  Show Profile
I'm in contact with him on his forum. It's a good testbed to see the result. You can join the discussion there. Then we can share the result here.

Think PinkPost v40b03 Patches<
Go to Top of Page

n/a
deleted

593 Posts

Posted - 28 February 2002 :  19:03:21  Show Profile
quote:

I'm in contact with him on his forum. It's a good testbed to see the result. You can join the discussion there. Then we can share the result here.

Think PinkPost v40b03 Patches



Just joined. Unicode based multilingual enviornment is the way to go for real multilingual environment...beauty of unicode is of course you can handle multiple languages with a single encoding scheme rather than having mulitple individual encoding schemes for all languages... Really a great base for globalization.

BTW, I have SHIFT-J version of 1041 (saved in ANSI 1252) which is also tested at i2AsiaFORUM, loaded at my lang1041 download site. Seahorse is notified. Unless you are going to consolidate a multilingual platform on unicode - ie a full unicode based Forum - there would be national encoding shemes required for individual languages and some languages have different flavors of encoding schemes - Japanese have SHIFT-JIS, JIS, SHIFT-JIS W/SINGLE BYTE SUPPORT, EUC and of course UNICODE. Chinese also have some different encoding schmes, etc. So, I would assume, a best is to have a unicode enabled language pack for all languages (a global multilingual pack) and language packs...esp to provide better choice in language implementation as I don't believe everyone will be option a truely globalized multilingual enviornment...But again, DB is already enabled.

leorat....
Continuing my experiment on Brinkster...for now.



<
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Snitz Forums 2000 © 2000-2021 Snitz™ Communications Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.27 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07