I saw your site. Looks really good! Thank you for sharing!
I know that there is not a tried and true standard convention for MOD creators regarding MOD notation. What I do when installing MODs, regardless of the MOD, is I add my own notation convention, and it goes like this:
'#### BEGIN MOD NAME by So_And_So - Edit # - Date ####'
'#### NOTES: If I need to add notes, I put them here ####'
'#### END MOD NAME by So_And_So - Edit # - Date ####'
If it is a Snitz update then, I do this:
'#### BEGIN SNITZ UPDATE # by So_And_So - Edit # - Date ####'
'#### NOTES: If I need to add notes, I put them here ####'
'#### END SNITZ UPDATE # by So_And_So - Edit # - Date ####'
The update number represents the topic # at http://forum.snitz.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=
# goes here
I understand what you mean about Snitz seeming to fall behind in "out-of-the-box" features. However, Snitz was not ever intended to compete with the mainstream as a commercial product. It was intended to serve as a teaching tool which it does. If we choose, it is our opportunity to help others, as students ourselves, to help others by offering our contributions to a repository like www.SnitzBitz.com for others to share in our accomplishments.
That is perhaps the toughest misunderstanding. The software is free for anyone to download and modify (except for the copyrights), yet the software itself seems to stand still in time not much unlike a student microscope found in a laboratory that is 50 years old and archaic but still does the job it was intended to do. It may not be able to define beyond 50x in magnification, but it can be tooled to do so without infringement. For what it was designed to do, which is to teach, it does not fail in that assignment.
Honestly, I think the guys have done a great job at not running with Snitz in its hey-day and going commercial with it. I mean, most folks would have capitalized on it despite the reason for which it was founded. The reason they don't add more features is partly because it is more upkeep on their part.
They are the guardians of the code so to speak. As it is, they have guarded it well. If they add more to it, that is that much more they have to guard. Doing this work as an act of community interest and not private financial gain and expecting more of them for free just makes it that much harder on them.
This site does have an avenue for donations. Perhaps the donation participation does not warrant the desired effort from the public to continue blossoming the base code.